Irin, Rahman,  New York – Uncertainty surrounding the Bangladesh Society election has deepened after the court directed both parties to submit their respective arguments and supporting evidence on December 17. The hearing scheduled for November 5 will not take place as planned. The court is expected to review the submissions before making its next decision, raising doubts about whether a final ruling on the election dispute will come before the end of the year.

Osman Chowdhury shared the latest development on Tuesday evening, citing Tamara Harris, the attorney representing the plaintiff. The Bangladesh Society election was scheduled for October 25. However, the court issued a stay on the election following a lawsuit involving the cancellation of Chowdhury’s membership and allegations of other irregularities. The Election Commission had completed preparations at five polling stations, but voting could not proceed.

The postponement has disappointed members of the Bangladeshi American community, particularly because more than 35,000 voters were expected to participate. The delay has also raised concerns about the financial costs associated with election preparations.

Chowdhury has challenged the decision to revoke his membership after it had initially been granted. According to his side, restoring his membership and recognizing his eligibility to contest for the presidency are central issues in the case. His side has also stated that the Bangladesh Society should bear the legal expenses incurred in the dispute.

Bangladesh Society President Ataur Rahman Selim offered a different account. Speaking on Tuesday evening, October 27, he said the society’s attorney was monitoring the case. Selim alleged that Chowdhury was involved in a conspiracy against the organization and claimed that a court directive supported the decision not to grant him membership. The competing claims remain disputed, and the court’s review of the evidence is expected to be important in determining the outcome.

The dispute has also raised questions about provisions in the society’s bylaws that allegedly restrict members from challenging executive committee decisions in court. The legal status and implications of these provisions remain matters requiring careful examination of the relevant court records.

Both sides are expected to submit their arguments and supporting documents on December 17. The court’s subsequent decision will be a key factor in determining when the Bangladesh Society election can proceed. Until then, the election remains on hold, leaving the organization and its members awaiting further developments.

NEW YORK — The Supreme Court of the State of New York, Queens County, has issued a temporary restraining order barring Bangladesh Society Inc. from proceeding with its scheduled October 25 election, according to a court order filed on October 23. The order, issued in a case brought by Osman A. Chowdhury, prohibits the organization and the named respondents from conducting the election, accepting votes, opening polling stations, counting ballots or certifying election results pending further order of the court.

The case, filed under Index No. 732174/2026, names Bangladesh Society Inc. and several of its officials as respondents. They include President S. M. A. Rahman, also known as “Salim”; General Secretary Mohammad Ali; Treasurer Mafijul Islam Bhuiyan; and Chief Election Commissioner Abu Nasher. The court also temporarily barred the respondents from enforcing an August 28, 2026, executive committee decision rejecting Chowdhury’s application for general membership.

According to the court papers, Chowdhury is seeking to overturn the executive committee’s decision denying his membership application. He has also asked the court to declare Article IX, Section 6, of Bangladesh Society Inc.’s constitution and bylaws invalid and unenforceable under New York law and public policy.

Among the relief sought, Chowdhury is asking the court to direct the society to admit or reinstate him as a member in good standing and recognize his eligibility to run for president. These requests form part of the underlying case and should not be confused with the temporary relief already granted.

The temporary restraining order also prohibits the destruction of relevant organizational and election records. These include original voter registries, membership applications, dues-payment records, voter lists and election ballots. The respondents have been directed to preserve those materials until further order of the court. The court documents list November 5, 2026, as the date for the next hearing.  The order is temporary and does not constitute a final ruling on Chowdhury’s membership claim or his request to invalidate the disputed bylaw provision.